Page 185 - Livre électronique des RFTP 2023
P. 185

P124.PARADOXICAL  BRONCHOSPASM: AN  UNCOMMON

               ADVERSE EFFECT OF SALBUTAMOL ADMINISTRATION

               KH. MAHMOUDI1, A. SAYHI1,2, Y.ABDELHEDI1, F. GUEZGUEZ1,2, I. GHANNOUCHI1,2,
               S. ROUATBI1,2

               1: LABORATORY OF PHYSIOLOGY AND FUNCTIONAL EXPLORATIONS, FARHAT HACHED HOSPITAL,
               SOUSSE 2: RESEARCHLABORATORY, LR12SP09


               INTRODUCTION :  Paradoxical  bronchospasm  is a condition  where
               bronchoconstriction       occurs    rapidly    and    unexpectedly      after   using     a
               sympathomimetic  bronchodilator.  This  creates a  paradox as  it contradicts  the
               expected  bronchodilation response. Here, we  report  a rare case of  paradoxical
               bronchospasm in a patient with asthma following the use of salbutamol.

               CASE REPORT : A 57-year-old man with a smoking history of 42 pack-years was
               diagnosed with asthma based solely on clinical data, 2 years ago. No other past
               medical  history was recorded. The patient was  treated with  a long-acting beta-
               agonist and salbutamol on demand. He has recently  experienced  worsening
               symptoms,  including dry  coughing episodes  over  the past two months. He was
               referred to the laboratory of Physiology and functional explorations for pulmonary
               function testing. Spirometry with a bronchodilation test was conducted according
               to recent international guidelines.  Baseline spirometry  showed a mild  proximal
               obstructive ventilator defect, as evidenced by z-scores of the FEV1/FVC ratio and
               the FEV1 of ""-1.93"" and ""-2.36”, respectively. The bronchodilator test using 400 µg
               of salbutamol was performed and showed reductions in FEV1 and FVC of 210 ml (-
               11%  from baseline,  -8% compared  to predicted  value)  and 370 ml (-13% from
               baseline,  -10% compared to  predicted  value), respectively.  Paradoxical
               bronchospasm was thus suspected based on the patient’s clinical manifestations
               and the results of the bronchodilatation test.

               DISCUSSION : Paradoxical bronchoconstriction is a rare adverse event associated
               with  bronchodilator therapy.  Possible hypotheses  include improper  inhaler
               technique leading to airflow turbulence, immunoglobulin E-mediated reaction to
               inhaler excipients, and irritation from  propellants, preservatives, or solution
               characteristics, particularly  in  β2-agonist metered-dose inhalers. However, the
               exact mechanism is unknown and further investigation is needed.

               CONCLUSION : It is important for both patients and healthcare providers to be
               aware and vigilant about the potential complications of paradoxical bronchospasm,
               despite its relatively low prevalence. A thorough investigation of each case is crucial
               to ensure accurate diagnosis and appropriate management.












                                                                                             183 | Pa g e
   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190